Payday loans are a convenient way to quickly acquire needed cash however it is important to educate yourself about your rights and responsibilities before you apply for a payday advance loan. During the repayment period it’s also important to understand your responsibilities and the difference between collection and harassment from the loan provider.Advance payday loans usually allow a person to borrow between one hundred and one thousand dollars unsecured upon the agreement you will repay the loan in lump sums usually direct debited from the borrowers’ bank account. Advance payday loans are easy to apply for; where a person only needs to fill out an application online, provide bank details, photo identification and confirm all information in the application is correct with the loan lender.Your responsibilities about repayment Once you have reached the repayment period you must repay the loan and the agreed fees or interest of the loan, usually this is by agreed direct debit. If you do not repay the loan amount the lender has the right to contact the person to arrange repayment. Should a direct debit fail or the borrower has unauthorized the direct debit not only can the individual incur fees by their bank but also be in breach of their original loan agreement.Your rights about repayment If you have agreed to a payday loan contract you have the right to enquire about a reduced repayment method should you not be able to meet the agreed repayment loan amount. A lender can contact an individual about repayment however lenders must not contact the borrower more than three times a week, must not frighten or make threats towards the borrower. Should this incur the individual has the legal right to report the lender for harassment. A lender can also only contact borrower’s between reasonable hours, usually business hours.What can happen if you refuse to repay an advanced loan If for any reason a borrower fails or refuses to repay an advanced loan a lender has the right to take the matter to small claims court if a repayment cannot be agreed upon. If the lender takes the matter to small claims the borrower may also be responsible for the lenders legal fees, however in some circumstances the lender may not take the borrower to court if the loan amount is small. If the original loan agreement was for an unsecured loan the lender cannot reposes items such as furniture, protected items under the law, however if the borrower has reliable income the court may garnish wages until the loan amount if repaid in full. If the borrower is not working and reliant upon welfare a court will not force a borrower to sacrifice welfare income as welfare is strictly for living expenses only does not cover debt repayment. If you are reliant upon welfare you can refuse to repay the loan until you are receiving a working income.Responsibilities of the lender A lender is responsible to make the terms of the loan agreement clear to the borrower as well as post any legal warnings on the website which can be accessed before applying for a loan. In Australia lender’s must include an FTC warning about borrowing disclaimer on the website. When applying for a loan, explore you are applying with a responsible lender that provides a warning about borrowing FTC legislated statement on the website.In conclusion As a potential borrower it is you must aware of the responsibilities and legal obligations you’re obliged to uphold when applying for an advanced payday loan. It is also in the borrowers best interest to educate themselves about their rights to report harassment or any irresponsible behavior on the lenders behalf.
Payday Loans: Learn Your Rights and Responsibilities
A Guide to British Employment Law
If you’re an employer or an employee, or even a solicitor, then you may have come across Employment Law. The following article explains the history of the laws of employment in Britain and the impact of the legislation which has occurred over the years.British Employment Law – The Industrial Revolution The British industrial revolution led to the introduction of employment laws in Britain. The reason for this was that, due to the advent of industrialism and use of machinery for the first time, workers were increasingly being asked to work longer and longer hours. The average working day, prior to the revolution was between 11-14 hours, however this had risen, with some workers working as many as 16 hours a day.British Employment Law – Working HoursIn 1833, a new law on employment hours was passed. This limited miners to no more than 12 hours work a day and children to just 10 hours. In 1848, a further reduction occurred, limiting all workers to just 10 hours.British Employment Law – The Factory Acts The Factory Acts (1802 and 1833), together with the 1832 Master and Servant Act were the first laws to regulate employment in the United Kingdom.Prior to 1960, the vast majority of laws regarding British employment was based on the Law of Contract. After then, due largely to Britain’s involvement in the European Union, there has been significant change and due to what is known as the “equality movement.” British Employment Law – The Equal Pay ActIn modern day terms, the Equal Pay Act of 1970 was a major turning point in British employment. Due to the radical nature of this Act, it didn’t come into effect until 1972. When it did, however, it brought much needed parity in pay and equality for women in the workplace. British Employment Law – Labor’s ReformsWhen Labor came to power in 1997, they set about reforming employment laws, with a series of measures designed to improve conditions for workers. Perhaps the most significant of these reforms was the introduction of the national minimum wage. In addition, the new working time directive governed working time, breaks and annual paid leave. Workers were also for the first time offered greater protection against discrimination on the grounds of age, religion or belief and sexual orientation as well as gender, race and disability.Now you now more about the history of Employment Law, and it’s affect on workers, isn’t it time you found out how it affects you?
The Increasing Surge of Health Care
While sitting back in her blue jeans and wearing a heavy workout sweater at the Legacy Emanuel Hospital’s Emergency room, Angela Jones has her feet prompted up and crossed atop of a small table. When asked about health care issues and how they affect her, Angela explains that there is a portion of people who suffer from not having health care insurance. She makes it clear that some of those who suffer most are young people. Jones, who is a college student, declared her passion for the young because it falls under her own age group.Says Jones, “The Oregon Health Plan should be open to more people who are under 21 years old. Private insurance shouldn’t be so expensive for young people.”According to national surveys, the primary reason people are uninsured is the high cost of health insurance coverage. Notwithstanding, nearly one-quarter (23 percent) of the uninsured reported changing their way of life significantly in order to pay medical bills. Economists have discovered that increasing health care costs correlate to drops in health insurance coverage.Jones believes that some of the greatest challenges that people face across this nation is obtaining affordable health care. “I would open an Oregon Health Plan to a variety of people who don’t have insurance. It is hard to get health insurance.”Terri Heer, a registered nurse at a local hospital, claims that in order to improve America’s health care system a key ingredient is to “make sure that everyone (has) access.”This would include cutting out on expenses that are not palpable to so called “health care needs”. Heer says, “First, we spend a lot of money servicing people for illnesses that can be prevented. Some of the money spent can go to other things.”Over the long haul, should the nations health care system undergo significant changes, the typical patient may not necessarily see the improvements firsthand. “I would love to say there will be a lot of changes. I am not a pessimist, but I don’t think there will be any change,” says Heer. Heer does allude to the fact that if more money were spent for people in the health care arena, she says that there is a possibility that the necessary changes would be more evident.Whether health care is affordable or not is an issue that affects everyone. According to a recent study last year, health care spending in the United States reached $2.3 trillion, and is projected to reach $3 trillion by 2011. By 2016, it is projected to reach $4.2 trillion. Although it is estimated that nearly 47 million Americans are uninsured, the U.S. spends more on health care than any other nation.The rising tide of health care stems from several factors that has an affect on us all. First, there is an intensity of services in the U.S. health care system that has undergone a dramatic change when you consider that people are living longer coupled with greater chronic illnesses.Secondly, prescription drugs and technology have gone through significant changes. The fact that major drugs and technological advancement has been a contributing factor for the increase in health care spending. Some analysts suggest that the improvement of state-of-art technologies and drugs increase health care spending. This increase not only attributes to the high-tech inventions, but also because consumer demand for these products has gone through the roof, so to speak.Thirdly, there is an aging of the population. Since the baby boomers have reached their middle years, there is a tremendous need to take care of them. This trend will continue as baby boomers will qualify for more Medicare in 2011.Lastly, there is the factor of administrative costs. Some would argue that the private sector plays a critical role in the rise of health care costs and the economic increase they produce in overhead costs. At the same time, 7 percent of health care expenses are a result of administrative costs. This would include aspects of billing and marketing.Terra Lincoln is a woman who was found waiting in the Emergency room at the Providence Portland Medical Center. When asked about the rising costs of health care, she said, “If you don’t have medical coverage, it’ll cost you too much money. If I leave the hospital right now and I need to buy two (types) of medicines, I couldn’t afford it.” Lincoln says that she is a member of the OHP, but she believes that there are still issues that need to be addressed.Terra recognizes that to reduce medical costs, she would have to start by getting regular checkups. “Sometimes people of color wait till they’re in pain before they get a checkup,” she said.A national survey shows that the primary reason why people cannot afford health care is because of soaring costs of health care coverage. In a recent Wall-Street Journal-NBC survey it is reported that 50% of the American public claims that their highest and most significant economic concern is health care. Consequently, the rising cost of health care is the number one concern for Democratic voters.Regarding the rising tide of health care, Kristin Venderbush, a native Wisconsin, and another patient in emergency at Providence says, “I worry a lot about what happens to the working poor. They don’t have OHP. If you can’t advocate for yourself, you will not get the health care you need…on every level.”Harvard University researchers conducted a recent study that discovered that the out-of-pocket medical debt for an average consumer who filed bankruptcy was $12,000. This study noted that 68 percent of those who had filed for bankruptcy carried health insurance. Apparently, these bankruptcy’s were results from medical expenses. It was also noted in this study that every 30 seconds someone files for bankruptcy after they have had some type of serious health problem.In spite of all the social and economic bureaucracy in the health care arena, some changes were made in Washington on January 28, 2008. In his State of the Union address, President Bush made inquired Congress to eliminate the unfair bias of the tax code against people who do not get their health care from their employer. Millions would then have more options that were not previously available and health care would be more accessible for people who could not afford it.Consequently, the President believes that the Federal government can make health care more affordable and available for those who need it most. Some sources suggest that the President not only wants health care to be available for people, but also for patients and their private physicians so that they will be free to make choices as well. One of the main purposes for the health care agenda is to insure that consumers will not only have the freedom to make choices, but to also enable those to make decisions that will best meet their health care needs.Kerry Weems, Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, oversees the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, also known as SCHIP. This is a critical program because it pays for the health care of more than six and a half million children who come from homes that cannot afford adequate health insurance. These homes exceed the pay scale for Medicaid programs, therefore are not able to participate.During SCHIP’s ten year span, states have used the program to assist families with low-income and uninsured children for their sense of well-being in the health care arena. The Bush Administration believes that states should do more of an effort to provide for the neediest children and enable them to get insurance immediately. The SCHIP was originally intended to cover children who had family incomes ranging from $20,650. This amount would typically include a family of four. According to sources, all states throughout the U.S. have SCHIP programs in place and just over six million children are served.Children and Health CareWashington’s PerspectiveWhat is driving health care costs?The fact that the U.S. faces ever increasing health care woes, has left many to believe that the country’s current crisis is on a lock-step path toward insolvability.